Authors

    Language

    English

    Publication Date

    3-1-2026

    Journal

    Open Forum Infectious Diseases

    DOI

    10.1093/ofid/ofag122

    PMID

    41852553

    PMCID

    PMC12994469

    PubMedCentral® Posted Date

    3-4-2026

    PubMedCentral® Full Text Version

    Post-print

    Abstract

    Inpatient infectious disease (ID) consult services have recently been experiencing increased patient volumes due to a variety of factors, including higher patient complexity, increased patient turnover, growing rates of antimicrobial resistant infections, population aging, and ID outbreaks. As a result, increased time and resources have been required to continue to deliver high-quality medical care to patients. At academic teaching hospitals, providing patient care in the context of increased volumes must be balanced with the educational mission for trainees. Rounding is a central component of ID clinical work which brings together patient care and education. In this narrative review, we aim to delineate different rounding styles and summarize the literature on inpatient rounding. We also discuss unique aspects of inpatient ID rounding and consider advantages and disadvantages of different rounding styles with attention to their impact on patient care, education, and workflow.

    Published Open-Access

    yes

    Share

    COinS
     
     

    To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
    you may Download the file to your hard drive.

    NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.