Language

English

Publication Date

9-1-2026

Journal

Neoplasia

DOI

10.1016/j.neo.2026.101327

PMID

42308836

PMCID

PMC13293650

PubMedCentral® Posted Date

6-17-2026

PubMedCentral® Full Text Version

Post-print

Abstract

We aim to highlight problems with the biological interpretation of computationally-derived hypoxia signatures for neuro-oncology research. By reviewing important experimental work in the field, we discuss common misinterpretations of the concepts of normoxia and hypoxia. In fact, the concentration of oxygen in the adult brain is in the range of 1-7%. Unfortunately, this oxygen concentration range is often mistakenly considered hypoxic in neuro-oncology experiments, although it should be considered physioxic. Further, given the lack of a universal hypoxic signature, we stress the importance of deriving cell type-specific hypoxic signatures using carefully-executed experiments.

Keywords

Humans, Gene Expression Profiling, Brain Neoplasms, Hypoxia, Animals, Transcriptome, Cell Hypoxia, Oxygen, Computational Biology, Hypoxia, Brain, Brain tumors, Bioinformatics

Published Open-Access

yes

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.