Language

English

Publication Date

2-2-2026

Journal

Scientific Reports

DOI

10.1038/s41598-026-38051-3

PMID

41629442

PMCID

PMC12916807

PubMedCentral® Posted Date

2-2-2026

PubMedCentral® Full Text Version

Post-print

Abstract

PETG (Polyethylene Terephthalate Glycol)–Carbon Fiber composites fabricated using fused deposition modeling are emerging as promising alternatives for lightweight UAV structures; however, their performance is strongly influenced by internal infill architecture and structural design. From an initial set of 21 infill patterns, five mechanically efficient patterns (Tri-Hexagon, Triangle, Support Cubic, Rectilinear, and Quarter Cubic) were shortlisted and evaluated through tensile, wear, impact, and hardness tests. Rectilinear infill exhibited the highest tensile strength (35 N/mm2) and superior wear resistance under loads up to 30 N, while Quarter Cubic showed comparable tensile performance (34 N/mm2). Support Cubic infill demonstrated the highest impact energy absorption (6.5 J), outperforming other patterns by more than 60%, whereas Tri-Hexagon and Rectilinear infills yielded the highest hardness values (73 Shore D). Based on this quantitative assessment, the Support Cubic pattern was selected for fabricating a full-scale PETG–carbon fiber drone frame using generative design. Drop tests revealed that the optimized frame withstood impacts up to 12 m (23.5 J), exceeding the failure threshold of a conventional carbon frame. This study identifies the support cubic infill as the best-performing architecture for PETG–carbon fiber composites, exhibiting superior tensile strength, impact resistance, and stiffness compared to other evaluated patterns, making it particularly suitable for lightweight UAV frame applications. These results demonstrate that strategic infill pattern selection enables PETG–carbon fiber composites to achieve application-specific mechanical advantages, offering a cost-effective and impact-resistant alternative for UAV frame structures.

Keywords

Fused deposition modeling, PETG-carbon fiber composites, Drone frame analysis, Drop test, Engineering, Materials science

Published Open-Access

yes

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.