Language
English
Publication Date
1-1-2024
Journal
Lancet Digital Health
DOI
10.1016/S2589-7500(23)00225-X
PMID
38123252
Abstract
Background: Large language models (LLMs) such as GPT-4 hold great promise as transformative tools in health care, ranging from automating administrative tasks to augmenting clinical decision making. However, these models also pose a danger of perpetuating biases and delivering incorrect medical diagnoses, which can have a direct, harmful impact on medical care. We aimed to assess whether GPT-4 encodes racial and gender biases that impact its use in health care.
Methods: Using the Azure OpenAI application interface, this model evaluation study tested whether GPT-4 encodes racial and gender biases and examined the impact of such biases on four potential applications of LLMs in the clinical domain-namely, medical education, diagnostic reasoning, clinical plan generation, and subjective patient assessment. We conducted experiments with prompts designed to resemble typical use of GPT-4 within clinical and medical education applications. We used clinical vignettes from NEJM Healer and from published research on implicit bias in health care. GPT-4 estimates of the demographic distribution of medical conditions were compared with true US prevalence estimates. Differential diagnosis and treatment planning were evaluated across demographic groups using standard statistical tests for significance between groups.
Findings: We found that GPT-4 did not appropriately model the demographic diversity of medical conditions, consistently producing clinical vignettes that stereotype demographic presentations. The differential diagnoses created by GPT-4 for standardised clinical vignettes were more likely to include diagnoses that stereotype certain races, ethnicities, and genders. Assessment and plans created by the model showed significant association between demographic attributes and recommendations for more expensive procedures as well as differences in patient perception.
Interpretation: Our findings highlight the urgent need for comprehensive and transparent bias assessments of LLM tools such as GPT-4 for intended use cases before they are integrated into clinical care. We discuss the potential sources of these biases and potential mitigation strategies before clinical implementation.
Funding: Priscilla Chan and Mark Zuckerberg.
Keywords
Female, Humans, Male, Health Facilities, Clinical Decision-Making, Diagnosis, Differential, Education, Medical, Delivery of Health Care
Published Open-Access
yes
Recommended Citation
Zack, Travis; Lehman, Eric; Suzgun, Mirac; et al., "Assessing the Potential of GPT-4 to Perpetuate Racial and Gender Biases in Health Care: A Model Evaluation Study" (2024). Faculty, Staff and Students Publications. 8453.
https://digitalcommons.library.tmc.edu/baylor_docs/8453
Comments
Errata Correction to Lancet Digit Health 2024; 6: e12–22 June 19, 2024