Language

English

Publication Date

10-1-2025

Journal

Applied Clinical Informatics

DOI

10.1055/a-2620-3147

PMID

40419253

PMCID

PMC12534124

PubMedCentral® Posted Date

10-17-2025

PubMedCentral® Full Text Version

Post-print

Abstract

Background

Electronic health records (EHRs) are widely implemented and consume nearly half of physicians' work time. Despite the importance of efficient data entry, physicians' typing skills—potential contributors to documentation burden—remain poorly studied.

Objective

This study aims to evaluate the typing skills of physicians and their associations with demographic characteristics and professional roles.

Methods

This cross-sectional pilot study included a convenience sample of physicians (residents, chief residents, and attending physicians) from the internal medicine division of an academic hospital. Participants completed a 1-minute typing test under supervised conditions. The primary outcome was raw typing speed, measured in words per minute (WPM). The secondary outcome was a performance score calculated by subtracting 50 points for each error from the total number of characters typed per minute.

Results

Participation rate was 100% (82/82 physicians). The mean age was 33.7 ± 7.3 years; 7.2 ± 7.1 years since graduation; and 45.1% female. The mean typing speed was 53.4 WPM (range: 31–91 WPM), with 57.3% (47/82) of participants exceeding 50 WPM, a threshold commonly considered professional. Bivariate analysis showed a significant negative association with age (Spearman's ρ = −0.281, p  = 0.011), which was not sustained in the multivariable analysis. No significant association was observed with sex, country of diploma, or role. Upon multivariable analysis, performance score showed a significant negative association with age (β = −17.724, p  = 0.009) but a positive association with years since graduation (β = 16.850, p  = 0.021), suggesting a generation- and experience-related interaction.

Conclusion

Nearly half of physicians exhibited professional-level typing skills, yet overall performance varied widely and was influenced by both generational factors and clinical experience. Given that documentation burden affects clinicians across all skill levels, both individual and systemic strategies—such as improved EHR design and alternative input methods—should be explored.

Keywords

Pilot Projects, Humans, Internal Medicine, Female, Male, Physicians, Adult, Electronic Health Records, Time Factors, Middle Aged, Cross-Sectional Studies, electronic health records, documentation burden, medicine, human–computer interaction

Published Open-Access

yes

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.