How to Peer Review a Neurology Education Manuscript

Authors

Daniel G Di Luca
Steven M Lazar
Preeta Gupta
Marie Charmaine S Lukban
Cole Crowson
Dara V F Albert
Jeremy J Moeller
Andres Fernandez
Andrew M Southerland
Zachary London

Publication Date

12-22-2023

Journal

Neurology Education

DOI

10.1212/NE9.0000000000200099

PMID

39359312

PMCID

PMC11419298

PubMedCentral® Posted Date

11-6-2023

PubMedCentral® Full Text Version

Post-print

Published Open-Access

yes

Abstract

Peer review is an essential process in scientific research, ensuring the comprehensiveness, accuracy, and suitability of manuscripts for publication. Neurology education research differs from biomedical clinical research in several ways. These differences encompass specific paradigms, the use of theoretical frameworks, and different methodological approaches. Despite the high number of studies and journal publications on neurology education, there is a dearth of resources and guidance on how to perform a formal review on this specific literature. This article aims to review the distinctive features of neurology education from clinical research while proposing an organizational framework and model for performing peer reviews of papers focused on neurology education.