Publication Date
1-1-2023
Journal
Frontiers in Pediatrics
DOI
10.3389/fped.2023.1233532
PMID
37859772
PMCID
PMC10582699
PubMedCentral® Posted Date
10-4-2023
PubMedCentral® Full Text Version
Post-print
Published Open-Access
yes
Keywords
hypoxia, clinical decision rules, pediatrics, primary health care, low-income countries, respiratory tract infection (RTI)
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Pulse oximeters are not routinely available in outpatient clinics in low- and middle-income countries. We derived clinical scores to identify hypoxemic child pneumonia.
METHODS: This was a retrospective pooled analysis of two outpatient datasets of 3-35 month olds with World Health Organization (WHO)-defined pneumonia in Bangladesh and Malawi. We constructed, internally validated, and compared fit & discrimination of four models predicting SpO
RESULTS: 12,712 observations were included. The independent and composite LASSO models discriminated moderately (both C-statistic 0.77) between children with a SpO
CONCLUSIONS: In the absence of pulse oximeters, both LASSO models better identified outpatient hypoxemic pneumonia cases than the WHO guidelines. Score external validation and implementation are needed.
Included in
Inequality and Stratification Commons, Medical Sciences Commons, Pediatrics Commons, Primary Care Commons, Respiratory Tract Diseases Commons