Feasibility of a Food-Based Diabetes Self-Management Education Intervention for Food Insecure Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A Convergent Mixed Methods Study

Authors

Eliza Short
Debbe Thompson
Douglas Taren
Holly Bryant
Rhonda Gonzalez
Jessi Sheava
Melanie Hingle

Publication Date

12-1-2023

Journal

Public Health Nutrition

DOI

10.1017/S1368980023002082

PMID

37759394

PMCID

PMC10755446

PubMedCentral® Posted Date

9-28-2023

PubMedCentral® Full Text Version

Post-print

Published Open-Access

yes

Keywords

Adult, Humans, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Quality of Life, Self-Management, Feasibility Studies, Food Insecurity, Feasibility study, Qualitative research, Food insecurity, Type 2 diabetes, Primary care

Abstract

Objective: To assess the feasibility of a food-based diabetes self-management education and support (DSMES) intervention delivered to persons with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) and food insecurity.

Design: This single arm pre-/post convergent mixed methods study tested the feasibility of a 3-month intervention using food boxes, recipes, DSMES and dietitian visits. Feasibility benchmarks assessed were acceptability (> 50 % participants satisfied), demand (> 50 % used program components) and implementation (75 % adherence, 80 % retention). Assessments included: self-reported food security, health-related quality of life, diabetes self-efficacy, socio-demographic and dietary intake, height, weight, and HbA1c and one in-depth interview with participants and key staff. Enrollment, recruitment and retention rates were summarised; qualitative data were analysed using structured thematic analysis (participant interviews) and key point summaries (staff interviews). Quantitative/qualitative data integration was conducted using a joint display.

Setting: Food bank and Federally Qualified Health Center in the Southwestern U.S.

Participants: English- or Spanish-speaking adults with T2DM and food insecurity.

Results: In total, 247 patients with T2DM and food insecurity were recruited, seventy-one expressed interest and twenty-five consented. Twenty-one participants completed study measurements. 71 % (n 15) received six home food deliveries and ≥ 1 dietitian visit. A priori benchmarks were approached or met within each feasibility criterion - most participants found the intervention to be acceptable, used most or all intervention components, and reported some challenges within intervention implementation (e.g. timing of food deliveries). Data integration provided deeper understanding of reported intervention implementation challenges, yet high adherence to the intervention.

Conclusions: The intervention was feasible. Next steps include a clinical trial to establish intervention efficacy.