
Children’s Nutrition Research Center Staff Publications
Publication Date
10-4-2021
Journal
The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
DOI
10.1093/ajcn/nqab223
PMID
34258613
PMCID
PMC8488872
PubMedCentral® Posted Date
7-13-2021
PubMedCentral® Full Text Version
Post-print
Published Open-Access
yes
Keywords
Disclosure, Editorial Policies, Humans, Nutritional Sciences, Periodicals as Topic, Publishing, Reproducibility of Results, Research Design, United States, transparency, reproducibility, reliability, P value, strategies
Abstract
Two questions regarding the scientific literature have become grist for public discussion: 1) what place should P values have in reporting the results of studies? 2) How should the perceived difficulty in replicating the results reported in published studies be addressed? We consider these questions to be 2 sides of the same coin; failing to address them can lead to an incomplete or incorrect message being sent to the reader. If P values (which are derived from the estimate of the effect size and a measure of the precision of the estimate of the effect) are used improperly, for example reporting only significant findings, or reporting P values without account for multiple comparisons, or failing to indicate the number of tests performed, the scientific record can be biased. Moreover, if there is a lack of transparency in the conduct of a study and reporting of study results, it will not be possible to repeat a study in a manner that allows inferences from the original study to be reproduced or to design and conduct a different experiment whose aim is to confirm the original study's findings. The goal of this article is to discuss how P values can be used in a manner that is consistent with the scientific method, and to increase transparency and reproducibility in the conduct and analysis of nutrition research.
Included in
Biochemical Phenomena, Metabolism, and Nutrition Commons, Dietetics and Clinical Nutrition Commons, Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Metabolism Commons, Nutrition Commons