Publication Date
3-27-2024
Journal
Cancers
DOI
10.3390/cancers16071308
PMID
38610986
PMCID
PMC11011041
PubMedCentral® Posted Date
3-27-2024
PubMedCentral® Full Text Version
Post-Print
Published Open-Access
yes
Keywords
melanoma, epidemiology, sex, cancer-specific survival, racial disparities in cancer survival, socioeconomic disparities in cancer survival
Abstract
Simple Summary
Melanoma is the deadliest form of skin cancer and its incidence and mortality may vary by demographic factors, such as sex, age, race, and socioeconomic status. Few studies, however, have characterized disparities in survival improvement across these demographic groups in melanoma. In the present study, the authors highlight disparities in melanoma survival improvement, both in diagnosed melanoma and carcinoma in situ. While melanoma survival has improved overall, some patient subgroups have experienced a lower improvement in survival from 2004 to 2018.
Abstract
Background: Melanoma is the deadliest form of skin cancer and its incidence and mortality vary by sex, age, race, and socioeconomic status. Relatively few studies, however, have characterized disparities in survival improvement across these demographic groups in melanoma. Methods: Survival data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database were obtained from 2004 to 2018. The compiled data were analyzed for cancer-specific survival (CSS) to produce multivariable Cox regressions that estimate sex-based survival disparities across patient demographic groups. Additionally, time-to-progression and survival analyses were conducted for a cohort of patients with carcinoma-in situ (CIS) that developed into melanoma. Results: In both female and male patients, melanoma diagnosis in more recent years (2014–2018 versus 2004–2008) was associated with an improved CSS, with females demonstrating an HR of 0.55 (95% CI: 0.49–0.60) and males demonstrating an HR of 0.49 (0.46–0.53). The trend remained consistent upon analyzing the effects of both sex and race on survival improvement for White and Hispanic males and females, but the results were not significant for Black and Asian patients. Joint sex and age analysis demonstrated significant reductions in HR across all age groups for female and male patients with a diagnosis in more recent years. Analysis of lesions progressing from CIS to melanoma (high-risk CIS) demonstrated an increased OR for males over females (OR: 1.70; 95% CI: 1.55–1.85), while survival analysis demonstrated no difference between sexes in the HR. Finally, for male patients, high-risk CIS demonstrated worse CSS compared to female patients with high-risk CIS (OR: 1.43; 95% CI: 1.15–1.79). Conclusion: Overall, melanoma survival has improved in recent years, though some patient subgroups have experienced a lower improvement in survival from 2004 to 2018.
Included in
Diseases Commons, Epidemiology Commons, Medical Sciences Commons, Oncology Commons, Race and Ethnicity Commons
Comments
Associated Data