Development and Evaluation of a Training Curriculum to Engage Researchers on Accessing and Analyzing the All of Us Data

Authors

Julie R Coleman
Jasmine N Baker
Shamika Ketkar
Ashley M Butler
LaTerrica Williams
Latanya Hammonds-Odie
Elizabeth G Atkinson
Debra D Murray
Brendan Lee
Kim C Worley

Publication Date

12-1-2024

Journal

Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association

DOI

10.1093/jamia/ocae240

PMID

39269931

PMCID

PMC11631121

PubMedCentral® Posted Date

9-12-2024

PubMedCentral® Full Text Version

Post-print

Published Open-Access

yes

Keywords

Curriculum, Research Personnel, Humans, United States, curriculum, continuing education, biomedical research, medical informatics, genomics

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The All of Us Evenings with Genetics (EwG) Research Program at Baylor College of Medicine (BCM), funded to engage research scholars to work with the All of Us data, developed a training curriculum for the Researcher Workbench, the platform to access and analyze All of Us data. All of Us EwG developed the curriculum so that it could teach scholars regardless of their skills and background in programming languages and cloud computing. All of Us EwG delivered this curriculum at the first annual All of Us EwG Faculty Summit in May 2022. The curriculum was evaluated both during and after the Faculty Summit so that it could be improved for future training.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Surveys were administered to assess scholars' familiarity with the programming languages and computational tools required to use the Researcher Workbench. The curriculum was developed using backward design and was informed by the survey results, a review of available resources for training users on the Researcher Workbench, and All of Us EwG members' collective experience training students. The curriculum was evaluated using feedback surveys during the Faculty Summit as well as virtual meetings and emails following the Faculty Summit.

RESULTS: The evaluation results demonstrated the success of the curriculum and identified areas for improvement.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: The curriculum has been adapted and improved in response to evaluations and in response to changes to the All of Us data and infrastructure to train more researchers through this program and other scholarly programs.

Comments

Associated Data