Language
English
Publication Date
3-8-2024
Journal
Research Integrity and Peer Review
DOI
10.1186/s41073-024-00143-x
PMID
38454514
PMCID
PMC10921741
PubMedCentral® Posted Date
3-8-2024
PubMedCentral® Full Text Version
Post-print
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Peer review is essential to the advancement of knowledge. However, training on how to conduct peer review is limited, unorganized, and not well studied. Thus, we sought to determine if a structured mentored peer-review program improved peer review training as measured by multiple quantitative and qualitative assessments.
METHODS: This pre-post intervention study enrolled 55 mentees across 5 cohorts from 2020 to 2023. Each cohort completed pre-program evaluations, participated in 2 mentored reviews, and completed post-program evaluations over 6 months. Mentors and mentees completed pre-program demographic and review experience questionnaires. Outcome measures included (1) total and sub-scores on the modified Review Quality Index (mRQI) applied to the same pre-selected research manuscript reviewed by mentees both pre and post intervention, (2) mentee self-perceived comfort with and understanding of the review process using a custom questionnaire, and (3) mentor satisfaction surveys. Pre- and post-program measures were compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.
RESULTS: Post-program total modified RQI score (median (IQR) = 31 (26.3-35.8)) was higher than pre-program total score (26.6 (19.7-29.7)) for the 42 mentees who completed both pre- and post-program reviews. Mentees reported improved perception of review (median (IQR) pre = 4 (3-4), post = 5 (4-5)) and editorial processes (pre = 3 (2-4), post = 4 (4-5)) as well as self-perceived confidence in completing an independent review of both scientific (median (IQR) pre = 2 (2-3), post = 4 (4-4)) and non-scientific (pre = 3 (2-4), post = 4 (4-5)) manuscripts following program participation. p < 0.0001 for all scores noted. Mentors reported high scores for enjoyment (median (range) 5/5 (3-5)) and interest in repeat participation (5/5 (2-5)).
CONCLUSIONS: A 6-month structured mentored-review program including 2 mentored reviews improves peer review training as measured by the modified RQI as well as participant self-perceived understanding of publication science with high mentor satisfaction.
Keywords
Peer review, Research, Surveys and Questionnaires, Mentorship, Training, Journalology
Published Open-Access
yes
Recommended Citation
Lyons-Warren, Ariel Maia; Aamodt, Whitley W; Pieper, Kathleen M; et al., "A Structured, Journal-Led Peer-Review Mentoring Program Enhances Peer Review Training" (2024). Faculty and Staff Publications. 3446.
https://digitalcommons.library.tmc.edu/baylor_docs/3446