Language
English
Publication Date
3-31-2025
Journal
Annals of Cardiothoracic Surgery
DOI
10.21037/acs-2024-etavr-0149
PMID
40270850
PMCID
PMC12013764
PubMedCentral® Posted Date
3-4-2025
PubMedCentral® Full Text Version
Post-print
Abstract
The rise of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) over the past two decades has substantially changed the lifetime management of patients with aortic valve disease. As the indications for TAVR expand to include younger and lower-risk patients, the proportion of patients who subsequently require reintervention for failed transcatheter heart valves (THVs) will increase. The two primary options for reintervention are redo TAVR and TAVR explant followed by surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). The indications for redo TAVR in the short term include emergency “bailout” procedures due to malpositioning, embolization, or long-term device failure due to paravalvular leak (PVL) or valvular degeneration. However, redo TAVR is not suitable for all patients. Those with prohibitive coronary anatomy, multivalvular involvement, severe patient-prosthetic mismatch, or endocarditis should be referred for TAVR explant, which is a comparatively higher-risk procedure. Redo TAVR has generally been associated with low mortality and complication rates, with key procedural considerations being valve selection [e.g., sizing, balloon-expandable valve (BEV) vs. self-expandable valve (SEV)], access, and coronary protection. TAVR explant poses numerous technical challenges, including concomitant ascending aorta or aortic root replacement, mitral valve involvement, or adhesions to the coronary ostia. Compared to redo TAVR, TAVR explant is associated with higher rates of short-term mortality and periprocedural complications. The 30-day mortality rates of TAVR explant approach 20%, and 1-year mortality rates range from 20% to 30%, with significantly greater risk associated with concomitant procedures. The data on both redo TAVR and TAVR explant are limited to observational cohorts without long-term follow-up. Given that patient populations and indications for redo TAVR and TAVR explant are vastly different, direct comparisons of outcomes between these two groups should be avoided. Nonetheless, multidisciplinary Heart Team collaboration remains imperative to advancing our knowledge of redo TAVR or TAVR explant procedures and the careful lifetime management of patients with aortic valve disease.
Keywords
Redo transcatheter aortic valve replacement (redo TAVR), TAVR explant, TAVR, aortic valve replacement, transcatheter
Published Open-Access
yes
Recommended Citation
Lee, Grace S; Tang, Gilbert; Zaid, Syed; et al., "The Current State of Redo Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (Tavr) and Limitations: Why Tavr Explant Is Important As the Valve Reintervention Strategy" (2025). Faculty and Staff Publications. 4220.
https://digitalcommons.library.tmc.edu/baylor_docs/4220