Language

English

Publication Date

7-17-2025

Journal

Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis

DOI

10.1016/j.jtha.2025.07.007

PMID

40683552

PMCID

PMC12329860

PubMedCentral® Posted Date

8-7-2025

PubMedCentral® Full Text Version

Author MSS

Abstract

Background: Hospital-acquired (HA) bleeding in medical inpatients is a serious complication with limited tools to predict risk.

Objectives: This study aimed to develop and validate risk assessment models (RAMs) for anatomic location-specific HA bleeding in medical inpatients using objective and routinely available risk factors.

Methods: Patients aged ≥18 years admitted to medical hospital services from 6 health systems and 15 hospitals in the United States between 2016 and 2020 for at least 1 midnight and without bleeding at admission were eligible for inclusion. Two health systems (10 hospitals) formed the development cohort, and 4 systems (5 hospitals) constituted the validation cohort. Bayesian Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator was used to develop anatomic site-specific RAMs.

Results: Among the development (153 707 admissions) and validation (137 460 admissions) cohorts, 5999 (3.9%) and 3282 (2.4%) HA bleeds occurred. RAMs had varied risk factors by anatomic bleeding location; for instance, older age was associated with genitourinary bleeding in men but not in women. Different cancer types were associated with different anatomic bleeding locations such as genitourinary cancers associated with genitourinary bleeding and gynecologic bleeding. The RAMs demonstrated good predictive performance for most anatomical bleeding locations; the C-statistic was ≥0.67 for all anatomic location bleeding in the development and validation cohorts and generally higher in the anatomic location specific RAMs.

Conclusion: These RAMs provide anatomic location-specific and sex-specific HA-bleeding risk stratification, addressing a critical gap in individualized risk assessment. Integration into clinical workflows could enhance patient safety and outcomes. Implementation studies are essential to maximize their clinical utility.

Published Open-Access

yes

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.