Language

English

Publication Date

1-1-2025

Journal

Saudi Journal of Ophthalmology

DOI

10.4103/sjopt.sjopt_292_25

PMID

41179376

PMCID

PMC12578414

PubMedCentral® Posted Date

10-13-2025

PubMedCentral® Full Text Version

Post-print

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose is to compare rates of stent extrusion and emergency visits in tied and untied Crawford stents for pediatric lacrimal surgery.

Methods: This retrospective chart review included 166 eyes of 129 patients from 2018 to 2022. Data collected included tied/untied status, premature prolapse, retention, and time of removal, number of postoperative visits, emergent visits before scheduled follow-up, final follow-up, and surgical success.

Results: Of 166 eyes, 97 received tied stents and 69 received untied stents. Success rates, defined by need for additional surgery and symptoms, were similar between groups. However, untied stents prolapsed more often (P < 0.05) but led to fewer total follow-up visits (P < 0.05), including emergency, clinic, and telemedicine encounters. Of the 32 early visits in the tied group, 15 were emergency room visits; none of the 9 early visits in the untied group were. Patients with tied stents had significantly more postoperative visits (mean 1.9 vs. 1.1; P < 0.05).

Conclusion: Untied Crawford stents for standard nasolacrimal duct intubation have similar success rates to tied Crawford stents. Untied stents had a significantly lower healthcare burden with fewer postoperative ER visits.

Keywords

Bicanalicular stent, extrusion rate, nasolacrimal duct obstruction

Published Open-Access

yes

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.