Language
English
Publication Date
2-18-2025
Journal
Pharmaceuticals
DOI
10.3390/ph18020269
PMID
40006081
PMCID
PMC11859749
PubMedCentral® Posted Date
2-18-2025
PubMedCentral® Full Text Version
Post-print
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Lithium is the gold standard for treating Bipolar Disorder (BD), but its effectiveness varies widely. While clinical and environmental factors may influence response, it remains unclear if screening tools can reliably predict lithium response outcomes. This study explores this potential using two widely used screening instruments for BD.
Methods: A total of 146 patients with BD were evaluated. Lithium response was assessed using the Alda Scale, while hypomanic and manic symptoms were characterized through the Hypomania Checklist-32 (HCL-32) and the Mood Disorder Questionnaire (MDQ). Group differences in HCL-32 and MDQ scores were analyzed using ANOVA, and a multivariate model was employed to identify predictors of lithium response.
Results: Of the total sample, 46 (31.5%) patients were identified as lithium responders based on the Alda Scale. Responders exhibited significantly higher HCL-32 scores compared to non-responders (p = 0.023), while no differences were observed in MDQ scores or other sociodemographic characteristics. Linear regression analysis revealed that HCL-32 scores were a significant predictor of Alda Scale scores, with no associations found for age, gender, or MDQ scores.
Conclusions: Our study underscores the importance of considering hypomanic symptoms when estimating lithium response in BD, particularly by utilizing the HCL-32 during screening.
Keywords
lithium, screening, bipolar disorder, hypomania, mania, treatment response, Alda scale
Published Open-Access
yes
Recommended Citation
Janiri, Delfina; Pinto, Mario; Montanari, Silvia; et al., "The Potential of Using Screening Tools for Bipolar Disorder to Predict Lithium Response" (2025). Faculty, Staff and Students Publications. 6100.
https://digitalcommons.library.tmc.edu/baylor_docs/6100
Included in
Medical Sciences Commons, Medical Specialties Commons, Mental and Social Health Commons, Psychiatry and Psychology Commons