Publication Date

9-1-2025

Journal

Canadian Urological Association Journal

DOI

10.5489/cuaj.9070

PMID

40392156

PMCID

PMC12453885

PubMedCentral® Posted Date

5-16-2025

PubMedCentral® Full Text Version

Post-print

Abstract

Introduction: Transurethral en-bloc resection of bladder tumor (ERBT) has emerged as an alternate technique to conventional transurethral resection of bladder tumor (cTURBT). While theoretically advantageous, the comparative effectiveness of ERBT across various technical approaches remains unclear. We performed an updated systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate perioperative, pathologic, and oncologic outcomes of ERBT vs. cTURBT.

Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and Google Scholar for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing ERBT and cTURBT. The primary outcome was recurrence-free survival (RFS). Secondary outcomes were operative time, complication rates, detrusor muscle presence, and need for repeated resection. Meta-analyses were performed, with subgroup analyses stratified by ERBT technique.

Results: A total of 10 RCTs with 1973 patients (1012 ERBT, 961 cTURBT) were included. Overall data favored ERBT in RFS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.85, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.71-1.01, p=0.07, I2=48%), with bipolar ERBT demonstrating significantly improved RFS (HR 0.51, 95% CI 0.32-0.81, p=0.004). ERBT had longer operative times compared to cTURBT (mean difference 3.52 minutes, 95% CI 1.25-5.80, p=0.001, I2=71%). There were no significant differences in catheter time or hospital stay between groups. ERBT had a non-significant lower incidence of bladder perforation (odds ratio [OR] 0.41, 95% CI 0.16-1.04, p=0.06, I2=52%) and obturator nerve reflex (OR 0.27, 95% CI 0.10-0.74, p=0.01, I2=79%) compared to cTURBT. ERBT was not significantly associated with higher detrusor muscle presence (OR 2.08, 95% CI 0.94-4.58, p=0.07, I2=78%).

Conclusions: ERBT might have oncologic and perioperative benefits, in addition to technical advantages, relative to cTURBT. Variations in resection instruments used impact the consistency of results.

Published Open-Access

yes

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.