Language
English
Publication Date
8-23-2022
Journal
IJC Heart & Vasculature
DOI
10.1016/j.ijcha.2022.101110
PMID
36051245
PMCID
PMC9424587
PubMedCentral® Posted Date
8-23-2022
PubMedCentral® Full Text Version
Post-print
Abstract
Background: Limited data is available on the comparison of outcomes of transradial (TR) and transfemoral (TF) access for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with end-stage stage renal disease (ESRD).
Methods: Online databases were queried to compare cardiovascular outcomes among TR. and TF in ESRD patients. The outcomes assessed included differences in mortality, cerebrovascular accidents (CVA), periprocedural myocardial infarction (MI), bleeding, transfusion, and periprocedural cardiogenic shock (CS). Unadjusted odds ratios (OR) were calculated using a random-effect effect model.
Results: A total of 6 studies including 7,607 patients (TR-PCI = 1,288; TF-PCI = 6,319) were included. The overall mean age was 67.7 years, while the mean age for TR-PCI and TF-PCI was 69.7 years and 67.9 years, respectively. TR-PCI was associated with lower incidence of mortality (OR 0.46 95 % CI 0.30-0.70, p < 0.05, I2 0.00 %), bleeding (OR 0.45 95 % CI 0.29, 0.68, p < 0.05, I2 3.48 %), and transfusion requirement (OR 0.52 95 % CI 0.40, 0.67, p < 0.05, I2 0.00 %) (Fig. 1). There were no differences among TR-PCI and TF-PCI for periprocedural MI, periprocedural CS, and CVA outcomes.
Conclusion: TR access was associated with lower mortality, bleeding, and transfusion requirement as compared to TF access in patients with ESRD undergoing PCI.
Keywords
Transradial, Transfemoral, Percutaneous Coronary intervention, End-stage renal disease
Published Open-Access
yes
Recommended Citation
Sattar, Yasar; Faisaluddin, Mohammed; Almas, Talal; et al., "Cardiovascular Outcomes of Transradial Versus Transfemoral Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in End-Stage Renal Disease: A Regression-Based Comparison" (2022). Faculty and Staff Publications. 997.
https://digitalcommons.library.tmc.edu/baylor_docs/997