Staff and Researcher Publications
Language
English
Publication Date
12-15-2024
Journal
Journal of Affective Disorders
DOI
10.1016/j.jad.2024.08.206
PMID
39226937
Abstract
Innovative technology-based solutions in mental healthcare promise significant improvements in care quality and clinical outcomes. However, their successful implementation is profoundly influenced by the levels of trust patients hold toward their treatment providers, organizations, and the technology itself. This paper delves into the complexities of building and assessing patient trust within the intensive mental health care context, focusing on inpatient settings. We explore the multifaceted nature of trust, including interpersonal, institutional, and technological trust. We highlight the crucial role of therapeutic trust, which comprises both interpersonal trust between patients and providers, and institutional trust in treatment organizations. The manuscript identifies potential key barriers to trust, from sociocultural background to a patient's psychopathology. Furthermore, it examines the concept of technological trust, emphasizing the influence of digital literacy, socio-economic status, and user experience on patients' acceptance of digital health innovations. By emphasizing the importance of assessing and addressing the state of trust among patients, the overarching goal is to leverage digital innovations to enhance mental healthcare outcomes within intensive mental health settings.
Keywords
Humans, Trust, Mental Health Services, Mental Disorders, Professional-Patient Relations, Clinical outcomes, Healthcare technology, Institutional trust, Interpersonal trust, Mental healthcare innovation, Technological trust
Published Open-Access
yes
Recommended Citation
Westheimer, Jessa Lin; Smith, Ryan P; Iacobelli, Peter; et al., "The State of (Mis) Trust: Human-Centered Technology Development & Implementation in Intensive Mental Health Settings" (2024). Staff and Researcher Publications. 98.
https://digitalcommons.library.tmc.edu/clinic_pub/98
Included in
Medical Sciences Commons, Mental and Social Health Commons, Psychiatry and Psychology Commons