Differences in performance for quality of care indicators for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) across various hospital categories in Texas
Abstract
The study analyzed Hospital Compare data for Medicare Fee-for-service patients at least 65 years of age to determine whether hospital performance for AMI outcome and processes of care measures differ amongst Texas hospitals with respect to ownership status (for profit vs. not-for-profit), academic status (teaching vs. non-teaching) and geographical setting (rural vs. urban). The study found a statistically significant difference between for-profit and not-for-profit hospitals in four process-of-care measures (aspirin at discharge, P=0.028; ACE or ARB inhibitor for LSVD, P=0.048; Smoking cessation advice: P=0.034; outpatients who got aspirin with 24 hours of arrival in the ED, P=0.044). No significant difference in performance was found between COTH-member teaching and non-teaching hospitals for any of the eight process-of-care measures or the two outcome measures for AMI. The study was unable to compare performance based on geographic setting of hospitals due to lack of sufficient data for rural hospitals. The results of the study suggest that for-profit Texas hospitals might be slightly better than not-for –profit hospitals at providing possible heart attack patients with certain processes of care.
Subject Area
Public health|Health care management
Recommended Citation
Pathak, Shweta, "Differences in performance for quality of care indicators for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) across various hospital categories in Texas" (2011). Texas Medical Center Dissertations (via ProQuest). AAI1502177.
https://digitalcommons.library.tmc.edu/dissertations/AAI1502177