Patients' preferences for a prostate cancer consultation, a discrete choice experiment

James Richard Incalcaterra, The University of Texas School of Public Health

Abstract

Four basic medical decision making models are commonly discussed in the literature in reference to physician-patient interactions. All fall short in their attempt to capture the nuances of physician-patient interactions, and none satisfactorily address patients' preferences for communication and other attributes of care. Prostate cancer consultations are one setting where preferences matter and are likely to vary among patients. Fortunately, discrete choice experiments are capable of casting light on patients' preferences for communication and other attributes of value that make up a consultation before the consultation occurs, which is crucial if patients are to derive the most utility from the process of reaching a decision as well as the decision itself. The results of my dissertation provide strong support to the notion that patients, at least in the hypothetical setting of a DCE, have identifiable preferences for the attributes of a prostate cancer consultation and that those preferences are capable of being elicited before a consultation takes place. Further, patients' willingness-to-pay for the non-cost attributes of the consultation is surprisingly robust to a variety of individual level variables of interest.

Subject Area

Counseling Psychology|Health care management

Recommended Citation

Incalcaterra, James Richard, "Patients' preferences for a prostate cancer consultation, a discrete choice experiment" (2012). Texas Medical Center Dissertations (via ProQuest). AAI3511057.
https://digitalcommons.library.tmc.edu/dissertations/AAI3511057

Share

COinS