Author ORCID Identifier


Date of Graduation


Document Type

Thesis (MS)

Program Affiliation

Genetic Counseling

Degree Name

Masters of Science (MS)

Advisor/Committee Chair

Meagan Choates

Committee Member

Blair Stevens

Committee Member

Syed Hashmi

Committee Member

Shannon Mulligan

Committee Member

Rebecca Lunstroth


Non-Invasive Prenatal Screening (NIPS) provides a risk assessment for aneuploidies by utilizing cell-free DNA (cfDNA). Recently, it was recommended that NIPS be offered to all pregnant people regardless of a priori risk for aneuploidy. In the absence of an increased risk, alternative motives for electing NIPS, such as for fetal sex disclosure, may arise and result in a less informed decision about proceeding with NIPS. Therefore, our study aimed to characterize low-risk patients’ motivations for NIPS election, compare motivations between informed and uninformed decision makers, and determine whether electing NIPS for fetal sex disclosure had any bearing on informed decision making. A survey that included a validated measure of informed choice (MMIC) and questions to assess patients’ motivations for NIPS was offered at four UTHealth clinics post genetic counseling. It was found that 44% of participants made an uninformed decision about testing. Participants with private insurers were 5.92 times more likely to make an informed decision (95% CI =1.28-33.05), and participants that self-identified as Black were 9.64 times more likely to make an uninformed decision (CI=0.009-0.737). Informed decision makers scored avoiding invasive procedures higher (p= 0.007) and ranked doing what family/friends desire lower (p = 0.0048) than uninformed decision makers. While most participants scored receiving information about genetic conditions highest, 12% of participants reported fetal sex disclosure as a priority. However, this was not found to be associated with uninformed decision making. Instead, prioritizing fetal sex was associated with a younger age (p=0.049) and experience with NIPS in previous pregnancies (p=0.034). This study ultimately established shared motivations with the high-risk population, showed no association between fetal sex disclosure motivation and uninformed decision making, characterized participants prioritizing fetal sex, and emphasized the importance of complete pre-test counseling.


NIPS, Non-Invasive Prenatal Screening, NIPT, Motivations, Fetal Sex, Informed Decision Making



To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.