Faculty, Staff and Student Publications
Language
English
Publication Date
4-29-2025
Journal
Dentistry Journal
DOI
10.3390/dj13050195
PMID
40422615
PMCID
PMC12110141
PubMedCentral® Posted Date
4-29-2025
PubMedCentral® Full Text Version
Post-print
Abstract
Background: Pulp tissue debridement and the eradication of microorganisms from an infected root canal system before obturation is a primary focus of endodontic treatment and the best predictor for the long-term success of endodontic treatment. Objective: The purpose of this in vitro laboratory study was to evaluate pulp tissue debridement and the disinfection efficacy of two different Er;Cr:YSGG laser units, with a 2790 nm wavelength, compared to ultrasonic-activated irrigation (UAI) in root canals infected with Enterococcus faecalis.
Methods: Human non-infected mandibular first molars were extracted, disinfected, and cultured with Enterococcus faecalis. Different types of Er;Cr:YSGG laser irrigation and UAI were performed according to the manufacturers' protocols. The teeth were then processed for bacteriological and SEM analyses.
Results: The different laser-activated irrigation protocols showed multiple areas of remaining bacteria, biofilm, tissue, and thermal ablation. The laser fiber tips also displayed significant tip degradation after use, which might affect efficacy.
Conclusions: In this in vitro study, laser-activated irrigation using Er;Cr:YSGG technology and UAI were inefficient in eliminating pulp tissue from difficult-to-reach areas and Enterococcus faecalis from infected root canals.
Published Open-Access
yes
Recommended Citation
Jaramillo, David E; Jeong, Ji W; Shen, Zhen; et al., "SEM and Bacteriological Evidence of Laser-Activated Irrigation Compared to Ultrasonic-Activated Irrigation: A Pilot Study" (2025). Faculty, Staff and Student Publications. 107.
https://digitalcommons.library.tmc.edu/uthdb_docs/107