Faculty, Staff and Student Publications

Language

English

Publication Date

3-1-2026

Journal

Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry

DOI

10.4317/jced.63947

PMID

42136697

PMCID

PMC13170951

PubMedCentral® Posted Date

3-30-2026

PubMedCentral® Full Text Version

Post-print

Abstract

Background: Twenty patients rehabilitated with screw-retained full-arch implant-supported prostheses functioning for at least one year were included.

Material and methods: This clinical study included 20 patients rehabilitated with screw-retained full-arch implant-supported prostheses in function for at least 1 year. Participants were allocated into two groups according to the implant-abutment connection design: external hexagon (EH; n = 10) and Morse taper (MT; n = 10). One peri-implant soft tissue biopsy specimen was obtained from each patient and processed for hematoxylin-eosin staining. Histological evaluation assessed epithelial hyperplasia, epithelial organization, inflammatory infiltrate intensity, and connective tissue fibrosis. Data normality was assessed using the Shapiro-Wilk test. Intergroup comparisons were performed using the Mann-Whitney U test, with a significance level of = 0.05.

Results: Mean epithelial hyperplasia scores were 2.0 in the EH group and 1.6 in the MT group (P = 0.690). Mean fibrosis scores were 2.2 (EH) and 2.4 (MT) (P = 0.841). Inflammatory infiltrate scores were 0.4 in the EH group and 2.0 in the MT group (P = 0.095). No statistically significant differences were observed between groups for any evaluated parameter. The combined histologic score also showed no significant intergroup difference (P = 0.222).

Conclusions: Within the limitations of this clinical study, peri-implant soft tissue architecture and inflammatory profiles were similar between external hexagon and Morse taper implant-abutment connections in full-arch rehabilitations following at least one year of functional loading.

Published Open-Access

yes

Included in

Dentistry Commons

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.