Publication Date
2-19-2024
Journal
BMC Urology
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy and safety of thulium fiber laser (TFL) to holmium: YAG (Ho: YAG) laser in ureteroscopic lithotripsy for urolithiasis.
METHODS: PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, CENTRAL, SinoMed, CNKI database, VIP and Wanfang Database were systematically searched for all relevant clinical trials until September 2023. References were explored to identify the relevant articles. Meta-analysis was carried out for the retrieved studies using RevMan5.4.1 software, and the risk ratio, mean difference and 95% confidence interval were expressed. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. The main outcomes of this meta-analysis were stone-free rate (SFR), perioperative outcomes and intraoperative or postoperative complications.
RESULTS: Thirteen studies, including 1394 patients, were included. According to the results of pooled analysis, TFL was associated with significantly higher stone-free rate (SFR) [0.52, 95% CI (0.32, 0.85), P = 0.009], shorter operation time [-5.47, 95% CI (-8.86, -2.08), P = 0.002], and less stone migration [0.17, 95% CI (0.06, 0.50), P = 0.001]. However, there was no significant difference in terms of the laser time, duration of hospital stay, drop of hemoglobin level, total energy, postoperative ureteral stenting, the incidence of intraoperative complications or postoperative complications between TFL and Ho: YAGs.
CONCLUSION: The findings of this study demonstrated several advantages of TFL in terms of higher SFR, shorter operative time and less stone migration.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: The protocol of this systematic review was listed in PROSPERO ( www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO ) (Protocol number: CRD42022362550).
Keywords
Thulium fiber laser, Ho:YAG, Urolithiasis, Ureteroscopic lithotripsy, Systematic review, Meta-analysis
Comments
The protocol of this systematic review was listed in PROSPERO (www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO) (Protocol number: CRD42022362550).
PMID: 38374098