Utility and Usability of Laser Speckle Contrast Imaging (LSCI) for Displaying Real-Time Tissue Perfusion/Blood Flow in Robot-Assisted Surgery (RAS): Comparison to Indocyanine Green (ICG) and Use in Laparoscopic Surgery.

Authors

Yao Z Liu
Shinil K Shah
Christina M Sanders
Chibueze A Nwaiwu
Alyson F Dechert
Saloni Mehrotra
Steven D Schwaitzberg
Peter C W Kim
Erik B Wilson

Publication Date

6-1-2023

Journal

Surgical Endoscopy

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Utility and usability of laser speckle contrast imaging (LSCI) in detecting real-time tissue perfusion in robot-assisted surgery (RAS) and laparoscopic surgery are not known. LSCI displays a color heatmap of real-time tissue blood flow by capturing the interference of coherent laser light on red blood cells. LSCI has advantages in perfusion visualization over indocyanine green imaging (ICG) including repeat use on demand, no need for dye, and no latency between injection and display. Herein, we report the first-in-human clinical comparison of a novel device combining proprietary LSCI processing and ICG for real-time perfusion assessment during RAS and laparoscopic surgeries.

METHODS: ActivSight™ imaging module is integrated between a standard laparoscopic camera and scope, capable of detecting tissue blood flow via LSCI and ICG in laparoscopic surgery. From November 2020 to July 2021, we studied its use during elective robotic-assisted and laparoscopic cholecystectomies, colorectal, and bariatric surgeries (NCT# 04633512). For RAS, an ancillary laparoscope with ActivSight imaging module was used for LSCI/ICG visualization. We determined safety, usability, and utility of LSCI in RAS vs. laparoscopic surgery using end-user/surgeon human factor testing (Likert scale 1-5) and compared results with two-tailed t tests.

RESULTS: 67 patients were included in the study-40 (60%) RAS vs. 27 (40%) laparoscopic surgeries. Patient demographics were similar in both groups. No adverse events to patients and surgeons were observed in both laparoscopic and RAS groups. Use of an ancillary laparoscopic system for LSCI/ICG visualization had minimal impact on usability in RAS as evidenced by surgeon ratings of device usability (set-up 4.2/5 and form-factor 3.8/5). LSCI ability to detect perfusion (97.5% in RAS vs 100% in laparoscopic cases) was comparable in both RAS and laparoscopic cases.

CONCLUSIONS: LSCI demonstrates comparable utility and usability in detecting real-time tissue perfusion/blood flow in RAS and laparoscopic surgery.

Keywords

Intraoperative, Perfusion, Robotic, Laparoscopic, Laser speckle

Comments

PMID: 36109357