Faculty, Staff and Student Publications

Language

English

Publication Date

2-1-2026

Journal

American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology MFM

DOI

10.1016/j.ajogmf.2025.101852

PMID

41248829

Abstract

Background: There is inadequate evidence on whether to retain or remove a cervical cerclage after preterm prelabor rupture of the membranes (PPROM). The PROMCerclage trial was the only study to randomize patients to cerclage retention or immediate cerclage removal after PPROM. The trial was terminated early, and results were not statistically significant but the cerclage retention group had shorter latency and more chorioamnionitis. Bayesian post-hoc trial analysis maximizes available clinical trial data by formally integrating information from preexisting studies or prior beliefs into statistical modeling to estimate the probability of a treatment effect.

Objective: To re-analyze published results of the PROMCerclage trial using a Bayesian framework to estimate the probability of benefit and harm for cerclage retention compared to removal on latency and chorioamnionitis in the event of PPROM.

Study design: We conducted a post-hoc Bayesian analysis of data from the PROMCerclage trial, which included 56 patients with a cerclage in place and subsequent PPROM who had been randomized to cerclage retention vs cerclage removal. Bayesian analysis uses prior information (priors) combined with study data to generate a posterior, or "final" effect size. The primary analysis assumed no association between cerclage management and delivery < 1 week after randomization and chorioamnionitis (prior relative risk [RR]=1). Other priors were specified using results of published observational studies. For each outcome, using each prior, we estimated the probability of benefit (RR< 1, lower risk of delivery < 1 week from randomization / lower risk of chorioamnionitis), RR, and credible interval (CrI).

Results: In the primary analysis comparing cerclage retention to removal, the posterior probability that delivery < 1 week from randomization was less likely (ie, RR < 1.0) was 21.9%. The posterior probability that chorioamnionitis was less likely with cerclage retention versus removal was 9.5%. Using priors incorporating results of previously published observational studies greatly influenced the results.

Conclusion: A Bayesian re-analysis of the only randomized trial of cerclage retention versus removal after PPROM found that shorter latency and more chorioamnionitis are more likely with cerclage retention than with immediate removal.

Keywords

Humans, Cerclage, Cervical, Female, Bayes Theorem, Premature Rupture of Fetal Membranes, Pregnancy, Chorioamnionitis, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Adult, Bayesian, PPROM, PTL, cerclage, cervical cerclage, chorioamnionitis, prematurity, preterm labor, preterm prelabor rupture of the membranes, preterm premature rupture of the membranes

Published Open-Access

yes

Download

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.