Faculty, Staff and Student Publications

Publication Date

7-1-2026

Journal

Annals of Vascular Surgery

DOI

10.1016/j.avsg.2026.02.023

PMID

41791491

Abstract

Background: The implications of intraoperative shunting during carotid endarterectomy (CEA) have been studied often with variable recommendations. While some surgeons favor routine shunting to minimize cerebral hypoperfusion, others reserve shunting based on intraoperative monitoring or high-risk clinical features. Predictors of shunt need not remain poorly defined. This study aimed to identify risk factors associated with overall shunt use and unplanned shunting in patients undergoing CEA.

Methods: We performed a retrospective review of a prospectively maintained large academic United States-based health system carotid surgery database between December 2004 and June 2024. Patients were stratified into two groups: procedures performed in absence of a shunt versus unplanned (selective) shunt. Demographic, comorbidity, operative variables, and follow-up results were compared using bivariate analysis. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent predictors of shunt usage. Missing data were addressed with multiple imputations.

Results: A total of 1,453 patients underwent CEA in our database: 617 (42.4%) without shunt and 836 (57.6%) with shunt. Of those who received a shunt, 718 (85.9%) were planned and 118 (14.1%) were unplanned. Multivariate analysis demonstrated predictors of overall unplanned shunt use including prior stroke, beta-blocker use, and thrombolytic therapy before surgery. Patients requiring unplanned shunting had longer clamp times, hospital stays, and ipsilateral stroke rates, though postoperative morbidity and mortality rates were comparable between groups.

Conclusion: In this cohort, prior stroke, beta-blocker use, and thrombolytic therapy were independently associated with unplanned shunt use during CEA. Among these, thrombolytic exposure prior to CEA conferred the greatest risk. This suggests that combinations of these high-risk factors could potentially guide preoperative decision-making for selective shunting surgeons, minimizing intraoperative stress and cerebral ischemia time.

Keywords

Humans, Endarterectomy, Carotid, Risk Factors, Male, Female, Retrospective Studies, Aged, Databases, Factual, Risk Assessment, Treatment Outcome, Middle Aged, Cerebrovascular Circulation, Time Factors, Aged, 80 and over, Carotid Stenosis, United States

Published Open-Access

yes

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.