Faculty, Staff and Student Publications

Language

English

Publication Date

3-1-2026

Journal

Oral Oncology

DOI

10.1016/j.oraloncology.2026.107877

PMID

41621281

Abstract

Background: The management of head and neck cancer relies on multidisciplinary expertise; however, access to tumor boards remains variable. Large language models (LLMs) may support guideline-based decision-making, although performance in complex oncologic scenarios is not well defined.

Methods: Fourteen synthetic cases based on real tumor board encounters were evaluated. Five blinded comparator arms produced recommendations: a human expert, Non-RAG-GPT-4, Non-RAG-GPT-5, RAG-GPT-4, and RAG-GPT-5. Eight head and neck oncologic surgeons scored each recommendation for appropriateness, clarity, specificity, and feasibility using 5-point Likert scales. Paired permutation testing and inter-rater reliability were assessed.

Results: LLM outputs showed close alignment with expert recommendations. RAG-based models achieved the highest mean scores across domains, with some statistically significant differences versus the expert comparator in appropriateness and clarity; however, absolute differences were modest. Inter-rater reliability was strong (ICC 0.73-0.87).

Conclusions: Advanced LLMs can generate guideline-concordant management recommendations in simulated head and neck cancer cases, supporting potential utility for decision support and education; prospective validation and expert oversight remain essential.

Keywords

Humans, Head and Neck Neoplasms, Decision Support Techniques, Language, Reproducibility of Results, Large Language Models

Published Open-Access

yes

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.