Faculty, Staff and Student Publications

Language

English

Publication Date

12-1-2025

Journal

Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics

DOI

10.1080/21645515.2025.2560061

PMID

40966492

PMCID

PMC12452441

PubMedCentral® Posted Date

9-18-2025

PubMedCentral® Full Text Version

Post-print

Abstract

The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices recommends human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination for inadequately vaccinated adults aged 27–45 based on shared clinical decision-making (SCDM). However, little is known about awareness and barriers to SCDM among US healthcare providers (HCPs), especially in Texas, where HPV vaccination rates are below the national average. Between January and April 2021, we conducted a population-based cross-sectional survey (12% response rate) of HCPs licensed in Texas to assess the prevalence and factors associated with awareness of the SCDM recommendation. HCPs were asked if they were aware and if they foresaw any barriers in implementing SCDM for HPV vaccine recommendation. Among the 1,279 respondents, 54.26% were aware of this recommendation. HCPs practicing as gynecologists/obstetricians (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 6.12; 95%CI: 2.60–14.40, p <  .001), those working in Federally Qualified Health Centers (aOR: 2.13, 95%CI: 1.24–3.65, p = .006) or group practices (aOR: 1.68, 95%CI: 1.22–2.30, p = .001), those seeing ≤ 100 patients/week (aOR: 1.70, 95%CI: 1.15–2.51, p = .008), those who had received formal training on HPV vaccination promotion and counseling within the past two years (aOR: 3.42, 95%CI: 2.29–5.10, p = <  0.001), between two and five years ago (aOR: 2.35, 95%CI: 1.67–3.30, p = <  0.001), and more than five years ago (aOR: 1.70, 95%CI: 1.16–2.50, p = .006) had significantly higher odds of awareness of SCDM recommendation. HCPs practicing as nurse practitioners/advanced nurse practitioners (aOR: 0.56; 95%CI: 0.38–0.82, p = .003), physician assistants (aOR: 0.62; 95%CI: 0.41–0.94, p = .023), aged 55 years or older (aOR: 0.57; 95%CI: 0.32–0.99, p = .046), Asian (aOR: 0.59, 95%CI: 0.43–0.81, p = .001) and non-Hispanic Black (aOR: 0.62, 95%CI: 0.40–0.97, p = .037) had significantly lower odds of awareness of SCDM recommendation. Overall, 44.96% of HCPs anticipated no barriers and planned to engage in SCDM, while 18.32% cited time commitment as an anticipated barrier. Internists cited time commitment (39.13%) as an anticipated barrier more frequently than other specialties, while physician assistants were more frequently unclear about how to implement SCDM (12.36%). We found limited awareness of the SCDM recommendation guideline for HPV vaccination among Texas HCPs. Therefore, training HCPs to use decision aids to actively engage patients in the SCDM process could improve HPV vaccination rates among unvaccinated adults aged 27–45.

Keywords

Humans, Papillomavirus Vaccines, Adult, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Middle Aged, Health Personnel, Male, Papillomavirus Infections, Texas, Vaccination, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Surveys and Questionnaires, Decision Making, Shared, Clinical Decision-Making, HPV vaccine, healthcare professionals, shared clinical decision-making, mid-adults

Published Open-Access

yes

Included in

Public Health Commons

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.