Faculty, Staff and Student Publications

Language

English

Publication Date

1-1-2026

Journal

The Journal of Pediatrics

DOI

10.1016/j.jpeds.2025.114567

PMID

40158840

PMCID

PMC13023385

PubMedCentral® Posted Date

3-28-2026

PubMedCentral® Full Text Version

Author MSS

Abstract

Objective: To investigate nongenetic factors that may contribute to observed differences in nonsyndromic orofacial clefts by infant sex.

Study design: Using data for 1997-2011 deliveries from the National Birth Defects Prevention Study, a case-control study, we separately examined associations between 23 maternal factors and cleft lip with or without cleft palate (CL/P) and cleft palate alone (CP) using multivariable logistic regression stratified by infant sex.

Results: We compared 2986 infants with CL/P and 1557 with CP to 11 271 control infants without birth defects. After adjusting for maternal age at conception and education, lower odds of nonsyndromic orofacial clefts were observed among male infants of non-Hispanic Black mothers (CL/P adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 0.36; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.28-0.45; CP aOR: 0.56; 95% CI: 0.41-0.76) and of Hispanic mothers (CL/P aOR: 0.84; 95% CI: 0.73-0.96; CP aOR: 0.57; 95% CI: 0.45-0.72) compared with non-Hispanic White mothers. Similar, though attenuated, lower odds of nonsyndromic orofacial clefts were observed among female infants of non-Hispanic Black mothers, but no association was observed among female infants of Hispanic mothers. Differences in associations between maternal education and nutrient intake (carbohydrate, energy, total lipids/fat, vitamin E, and zinc) and CL/P, as well as maternal vitamin C intake and CP, were also observed by infant sex.

Conclusions: Associations between nonsyndromic orofacial clefts and minority racial and ethnic groups were attenuated or nonexistent among female infants compared with male infants. Sex-specific differences of CL/P appear more susceptible to environmental factors (eg, maternal education and nutrient intake) than sex-specific differences of CP.

Keywords

Humans, Cleft Lip, Cleft Palate, Female, Male, Case-Control Studies, United States, Infant, Newborn, Sex Factors, Adult, Infant, Risk Factors, Logistic Models, cleft lip, cleft palate, epidemiology, nutrient intake, race and ethnicity, sex ratio

Published Open-Access

yes

Included in

Public Health Commons

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.