Faculty, Staff and Student Publications

Language

English

Publication Date

1-1-2026

Journal

Journal of Substance Use and Addiction Treatment

DOI

10.1016/j.josat.2025.209830

PMID

41175976

PMCID

PMC12997081

PubMedCentral® Posted Date

3-19-2026

PubMedCentral® Full Text Version

Author MSS

Abstract

Introduction: This paper provides an in-depth examination of examines four recovery residences, that serve individuals prescribed medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD). The study has two primary aims: first, to deepen understanding of how recovery residences adopt and operationalize Social Model of Recovery principles; and second, to identify gaps in staff integration of residents receiving MOUD-gaps that may either support or undermine the integrity of the social model within these settings.

Methods: We conducted semi-structured interviews with 17 residents receiving MOUD living in four participating recovery homes. The interviews were conducted between August 2022 and January 2024 using a semi-structured interview guide designed to explore residents' experiences upon entering and living in the recovery home. Qualitative software was used to organize and qualitatively analyze transcripts through multiple rounds of coding. Themes were discussed across the research team and grouped across each of the various principles of the Social Model of Recovery.

Results: Residents reported feeling supported in safe, structured environments that promoted accountability and community, while staff with lived experience played a central role in fostering trust and modeling long-term recovery. Structured programming, peer coaching, and access to essential resources further reinforced recovery-supportive conditions. However, inconsistent staff attitudes toward MOUD revealed underlying stigma, which some residents found intrusive or isolating.

Conclusion: This study addresses key gaps in recovery science by offering qualitative insights into Level 3 recovery residences, emphasizing the perspectives of residents navigating staff relationships, organizational policies, and recovery programming. Despite increasing MOUD acceptance, recovery homes rarely address MOUD-related stigma formally, creating tension between medical and social models of recovery and contributing to judgment or marginalization of MOUD recipients. These findings highlight the urgent need for evidence-based MOUD integration strategies, staff education, and stigma reduction efforts to ensure that recovery homes fully support all residents' recovery pathways.

Keywords

Humans, Opioid-Related Disorders, Male, Female, Adult, Middle Aged, Qualitative Research, Recovery housing, Medication for opioid use disorder, Stigma

Published Open-Access

yes

Included in

Public Health Commons

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.