Faculty, Staff and Student Publications
Language
English
Publication Date
3-1-2026
Journal
Academic Emergency Medicine
DOI
10.1111/acem.70211
PMID
41416819
PMCID
PMC12923265
PubMedCentral® Posted Date
2-21-2026
PubMedCentral® Full Text Version
Author MSS
Abstract
Background: ED disposition decisions for older adults are complex and often uncertain, yet studies rarely capture emergency physicians' real-time perspectives.
Objective: To assess patient outcomes based on emergency physician-perceived need for admission.
Design: Single-site prospective cohort study conducted between July and November 2024.
Setting: A Boston-area academic tertiary care ED.
Participants: Patients aged 65 and older dispositioned by attending physicians, excluding patients who were handed off, left without being seen, or eloped.
Measurements: Physicians rated admission need using a 5-point Likert scale (2-4 considered marginal). Primary outcome was ED disposition stratified by rating. Secondary outcomes were hospital length-of-stay (LOS), 7-day ED return, and 30-day mortality.
Results: Of the 489 patients (mean age 76.9 years [SD 7.5], 51.1% female), 55.8% were non-marginal admissions, 26.0% were non-marginal discharges, and 18.2% were marginal dispositions. Patients with marginal dispositions had longer workup times than non-marginal admissions or discharges (3.3 vs. 2.8 vs. 2.4 h, p < 0.05). Thirty-day mortality was greater for non-marginal admissions (8.8%) than non-marginal discharges (1.6%, p = 0.01), but not significantly different than marginal dispositions (3.4%). Marginal admissions had shorter median LOS (3.1 vs. 5 days, p < 0.01) and higher early discharge rates (27.8% vs. 13.2%, p = 0.01) than non-marginal admissions. Marginal discharges had fewer 7-day returns than non-marginal discharges (0% vs. 11.7%, p = 0.04). For marginal cases, physicians discussed admission benefits more than risks (70.1% vs. 43.3%, p < 0.01) for marginal cases.
Limitations: Single-site and need for admission were reported contemporaneous with disposition decision.
Conclusions: One in six older adult ED dispositions was identified as marginal. These patients are potential targets for shared decision-making and alternative care pathways.
Keywords
Humans, Female, Aged, Male, Prospective Studies, Emergency Service, Hospital, Length of Stay, Decision Making, Shared, Aged, 80 and over, Boston, Patient Discharge, Patient Admission
Published Open-Access
yes
Recommended Citation
Haimovich, Adrian D; Chary, Anita; Burke, Laura; et al., "Marginal Dispositions and Shared Decision-Making Among Older Adults in the ED: A Prospective Cohort Study" (2026). Faculty, Staff and Student Publications. 1486.
https://digitalcommons.library.tmc.edu/uthsph_docs/1486