Wire-in-Needle Versus Conventional Syringe-on-Needle Technique for Ultrasound-Guided Central Venous Catheter Insertion in the Internal Jugular Vein: The Win Randomized Trial

Authors

• Kristen K Thomsen
• Jovana Stekovic
• Felix Köster
• Alina Bergholz
• Karim Kouz
• Moritz Flick
• Daniel I Sessler
• Christian Zöllner
• Bernd Saugel
• Leonie Schulte-Uentrop

Language

English

Publication Date

10-1-2025

Journal

Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing

DOI

10.1007/s10877-024-01232-4

PMID

39400666

PMCID

PMC12474687

PubMedCentral® Posted Date

10-14-2024

PubMedCentral® Full Text Version

Post-print

Abstract

Purpose: There are different techniques for ultrasound-guided central venous catheter (CVC) insertion. When using the conventional syringe-on-needle technique, the syringe needs to be removed from the needle after venous puncture to pass the guidewire through the needle into the vein. When, alternatively, using the wire-in-needle technique, the needle is preloaded with the guidewire, and the guidewire-after venous puncture-is advanced into the vein under real-time ultrasound guidance. We tested the hypothesis that the wire-in-needle technique reduces the time to successful guidewire insertion in the internal jugular vein compared with the syringe-on-needle technique in adults.

Methods: We randomized 250 patients to the wire-in-needle or syringe-on-needle technique. Our primary endpoint was the time to successful guidewire insertion in the internal jugular vein.

Results: Two hundred and thirty eight patients were analyzed. The median (25th percentile, 75th percentile) time to successful guidewire insertion was 22 (16, 38) s in patients assigned to the wire-in-needle technique and 25 (19, 34) s in patients assigned to the syringe-on-needle technique (estimated location shift: 2 s; 95%-confidence-interval: - 1 to 5 s, p = 0.165). CVC insertion was successful on the first attempt in 103/116 patients (89%) assigned to the wire-in-needle technique and in 113/122 patients (93%) assigned to the syringe-on-needle technique. CVC insertion-related complications occurred in 8/116 patients (7%) assigned to the wire-in-needle technique and 19/122 patients (16%) assigned to the syringe-on-needle technique.

Conclusion: The wire-in-needle technique-compared with the syringe-on-needle technique-did not reduce the time to successful guidewire insertion in the internal jugular vein. Clinicians can consider either technique for ultrasound-guided CVC insertion in adults.

Keywords

Humans, Jugular Veins, Catheterization, Central Venous, Male, Female, Middle Aged, Ultrasonography, Interventional, Needles, Syringes, Aged, Adult, Central Venous Catheters, Anesthesia, Complications, Guidewire, Procedural time, Surgery

Published Open-Access

yes

Recommended Citation

Thomsen, Kristen K; Stekovic, Jovana; Köster, Felix; et al., "Wire-in-Needle Versus Conventional Syringe-on-Needle Technique for Ultrasound-Guided Central Venous Catheter Insertion in the Internal Jugular Vein: The Win Randomized Trial" (2025). Faculty, Staff and Student Publications. 1520.
https://digitalcommons.library.tmc.edu/uthsph_docs/1520