Publication Date
10-1-2022
Journal
Human Genetics
DOI
10.1007/s00439-022-02457-6
PMID
35488922
PMCID
PMC9055222
PubMedCentral® Posted Date
4-30-2022
PubMedCentral® Full Text Version
Post-print
Published Open-Access
yes
Keywords
Computational Biology, Genetic Testing, Genetic Variation, Genome, Human, Humans, Reproducibility of Results
Abstract
Estimating the effects of variants found in disease driver genes opens the door to personalized therapeutic opportunities. Clinical associations and laboratory experiments can only characterize a tiny fraction of all the available variants, leaving the majority as variants of unknown significance (VUS). In silico methods bridge this gap by providing instant estimates on a large scale, most often based on the numerous genetic differences between species. Despite concerns that these methods may lack reliability in individual subjects, their numerous practical applications over cohorts suggest they are already helpful and have a role to play in genome interpretation when used at the proper scale and context. In this review, we aim to gain insights into the training and validation of these variant effect predicting methods and illustrate representative types of experimental and clinical applications. Objective performance assessments using various datasets that are not yet published indicate the strengths and limitations of each method. These show that cautious use of in silico variant impact predictors is essential for addressing genome interpretation challenges.
Included in
Biochemistry, Biophysics, and Structural Biology Commons, Biology Commons, Genetic Phenomena Commons, Immunotherapy Commons, Medical Genetics Commons, Medical Specialties Commons
Comments
Associated Data