Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy Staff Publications
Language
English
Publication Date
1-1-2025
Journal
AJOB Empirical Bioethics
DOI
10.1080/23294515.2024.2399519
PMID
39250769
PMCID
PMC11785495
PubMedCentral® Posted Date
1-1-2026
PubMedCentral® Full Text Version
Author MSS
Abstract
Introduction: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is approved under a humanitarian device exemption to manage treatment-resistant obsessive-compulsive disorder (TR-OCD) in adults. It is possible that DBS may be trialed or used clinically off-label in children and adolescents with TR-OCD in the future. DBS is already used to manage treatment-resistant childhood dystonia. Evidence suggests it is a safe and effective intervention for certain types of dystonia. Important questions remain unanswered about the use of DBS in children and adolescents with TR-OCD, including whether mental health clinicians would refer pediatric patients for DBS, and who would be a good candidate for DBS.
Objectives: To explore mental health clinicians' views on what clinical and psychosocial factors they would consider when determining which children with OCD would be good DBS candidates.
Materials and methods: In depth, semi-structured interviews were conducted with n = 25 mental health clinicians who treat pediatric patients with OCD. The interviews were transcribed, coded, and analyzed using thematic content analysis. Three questions focused on key, clinical, and psychosocial factors for assessing candidacy were analyzed to explore respondent views on candidacy factors. Our analysis details nine overarching themes expressed by clinicians, namely the patient's previous OCD treatment, OCD severity, motivation to commit to treatment, presence of comorbid conditions, family environment, education on DBS, quality of life, accessibility to treatment, and patient age and maturity.
Conclusions: Clinicians generally saw considering DBS treatment in youth as a last resort and only for very specific cases. DBS referral was predominantly viewed as acceptable for children with severe TR-OCD who have undertaken intensive, appropriate treatment without success, whose OCD has significantly reduced their quality of life, and who exhibit strong motivation to continue treatment given the right environment. Appropriate safeguards, eligibility criteria, and procedures should be discussed and identified before DBS for childhood TR-OCD becomes practice.
Keywords
Humans, Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, Deep Brain Stimulation, Child, Adolescent, Female, Male, Attitude of Health Personnel, Adult, Patient Selection, Qualitative Research, deep brain stimulation, pediatric patients, OCD, treatment-resistance, DBS candidacy factors, mental health clinicians
Published Open-Access
yes
Recommended Citation
Cenolli, Ilona; Campbell, Tiffany A; Dorfman, Natalie; et al., "Deep Brain Stimulation for Childhood Treatment-Resistant Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: Mental Health Clinician Views on Candidacy Factors" (2025). Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy Staff Publications. 348.
https://digitalcommons.library.tmc.edu/med_ethics/348