data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/613fb/613fb129cd7d4b8c68f4707343ff18be1ebf3d21" alt="MD Anderson UTHealth Houston Graduate School"
Faculty, Staff and Student Publications
Publication Date
7-5-2024
Journal
The Oncologist
Abstract
Missing visual elements (MVE) in Kaplan-Meier (KM) curves can misrepresent data, preclude curve reconstruction, and hamper transparency. This study evaluated KM plots of phase III oncology trials. MVE were defined as an incomplete y-axis range or missing number at risk table in a KM curve. Surrogate endpoint KM curves were additionally evaluated for complete interpretability, defined by (1) reporting the number of censored patients and (2) correspondence of the disease assessment interval with the number at risk interval. Among 641 trials enrolling 518 235 patients, 116 trials (18%) had MVE in KM curves. Industry sponsorship, larger trials, and more recently published trials were correlated with lower odds of MVE. Only 3% of trials (15 of 574) published surrogate endpoint KM plots with complete interpretability. Improvements in the quality of KM curves of phase III oncology trials, particularly for surrogate endpoints, are needed for greater interpretability, reproducibility, and transparency in oncology research.
Keywords
Humans, Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic, Kaplan-Meier Estimate, Neoplasms, Medical Oncology, randomized controlled trials, phase III, Kaplan-Meier, clinical research, data visualization, time-to-event outcomes
DOI
10.1093/oncolo/oyae067
PMID
38824414
PMCID
PMC11224967
PubMedCentral® Posted Date
June 2024
PubMedCentral® Full Text Version
Post-print
Published Open-Access
yes
Included in
Bioinformatics Commons, Biomedical Informatics Commons, Medical Sciences Commons, Oncology Commons
Comments
Supplementary Material
Data Availability Statement
PMID: 38824414