data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/613fb/613fb129cd7d4b8c68f4707343ff18be1ebf3d21" alt="MD Anderson UTHealth Houston Graduate School"
Faculty, Staff and Student Publications
Publication Date
4-1-2023
Journal
Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics
Abstract
PURPOSE: To quantify the potential error in outputs for flattening filter free (FFF) beams associated with use of a lead foil in beam quality determination per the addendum protocol for TG-51, we examined differences in measurements of the beam quality conversion factor k
METHODS: Two FFF beams, a 6 MV FFF and a 10 MV FFF, were calibrated on eight Varian TrueBeams and two Elekta Versa HD linear accelerators (linacs) according to the TG-51 addendum protocol by using Farmer ionization chambers [TN 30013 (PTW) and SNC600c (Sun Nuclear)] with traceable absorbed dose-to-water calibrations. In determining k
RESULTS: Differences in %dd(10)x with lead foil and with omission of lead foil were 0.9 ± 0.2% for the 6 MV FFF beam and 0.6 ± 0.1% for the 10 MV FFF beam. Differences in k
CONCLUSION: With evaluation of the lead foil role in determination of the k
Keywords
beam quality, flattening filter free (FFF) beams, lead foil, TG‐51 addendum protocol
DOI
10.1002/acm2.13960
PMID
36913192
PMCID
PMC10113695
PubMedCentral® Posted Date
March 2023
PubMedCentral® Full Text Version
Post-print
Published Open-Access
yes
Included in
Bioinformatics Commons, Biomedical Informatics Commons, Health and Medical Physics Commons, Medical Sciences Commons, Oncology Commons
Comments
PMID: 36913192