Quality-Adjusted Survival in Women With Gynecologic Malignancies Receiving Imrt After Surgery: A Ppatient Rreported Ooutcome Study of NRG Oncology’s RTOG 1203

Authors

Andre Konski
Snehal Deshmukh
Ann H Klopp
Anamaria R Yeung
Shannon N Westin
J Spencer Thompson
Desiree E Doncals
Guilherme H C Cantuaria
David P D'Souza
Amy Chang
Vijayananda Kundapur
Dasarahally S Mohan
Michael L Haas
Yong Bae Kim
Catherine L Ferguson
Stephanie L Pugh
Lisa A Kachnic
Deborah W Bruner

Publication Date

8-1-2023

Journal

Gynecologic Oncology

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: NRG/RTOG 1203 compared 3-D conformal radiotherapy (3D CRT) to intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in patients with endometrial or cervical cancer requiring post-operative radiotherapy after hysterectomy. The purpose of this study was to report the first quality-adjusted survival analysis comparing the two treatments.

METHODS: NRG/RTOG 1203 randomized patients having undergone hysterectomy to either 3DCRT or IMRT. Stratification factors included RT dose, chemotherapy, and disease site. The EQ-5D, both index and visual analog scale (VAS), were obtained at baseline, 5 weeks after the start of RT, 4-6 weeks post RT and 1 and 3-years post RT. EQ-5D index and VAS scores along with quality-adjusted survival (QAS) were compared between treatment arms using the t-test at a two-sided significance level of 0.05.

RESULTS: NRG/RTOG 1203 enrolled 289 patients of which 236 consented to participate in the patient reported outcome (PRO) assessments. QAS was higher in women treated with IMRT, 1374 vs 1333 days (p = 0.5) compared to patients treated with 3DCRT, but this difference was not statistically different. Patients treated with IMRT had less of a decline in VAS score 5 weeks post RT, -5.04, compared to patients treated with 3DCRT, -7.48, although not statistically significant (p = 0.38).

CONCLUSION: This is the first report of the use of the EQ-5D comparing two radiotherapy techniques in the treatment of gynecologic malignancies after surgery. While there were no significant differences in QAS and VAS scores between patients who received IMRT vs. 3DCRT, RTOG 1203 was not powered to show statistical differences in these secondary endpoints.

Keywords

Humans, Female, Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated, Genital Neoplasms, Female, Radiotherapy, Conformal, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted, Radiotherapy Dosage, Utilities, Intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), patient reported outcomes, endometrial cancer, cervical cancer

Comments

PMID: 37393743