The Effect Direction Should Be Taken Into Account When Assessing Small-Study Effects

Authors

Zhuo Meng
Chong Wu
Lifeng Lin

Publication Date

3-1-2023

Journal

Journal of Evidence-Based Dental Practice

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Studies with statistically significant results are frequently more likely to be published than those with non-significant results. This phenomenon leads to publication bias or small-study effects and can seriously affect the validity of the conclusion from systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Small-study effects typically appear in a specific direction, depending on whether the outcome of interest is beneficial or harmful, but this direction is rarely taken into account in conventional methods.

METHODS: We propose to use directional tests to assess potential small-study effects. The tests are built on a one-sided testing framework based on the existing Egger's regression test. We performed simulation studies to compare the proposed one-sided regression tests, conventional two-sided regression tests, as well as two other competitive methods (Begg's rank test and the trim-and-fill method). Their performance was measured by type I error rates and statistical power. Three real-world meta-analyses on measurements of infrabony periodontal defects were also used to examine the various methods' performance.

RESULTS: Based on simulation studies, the one-sided tests could have considerably higher statistical power than competing methods, particularly their two-sided counterparts. Their type I error rates were generally controlled well. In the case study of the three real-world meta-analyses, by accounting for the favored direction of effects, the one-sided tests could rule out potential false-positive conclusions about small-study effects. They also are more powerful in assessing small-study effects than the conventional two-sided tests when true small-study effects likely exist.

CONCLUSION: We recommend researchers incorporate the potential favored direction of effects into the assessment of small-study effects.

Keywords

Humans, Publication Bias, Research Design, Dentistry

Comments

Associated Data

PMID: 36914304

DOI

10.1016/j.jebdp.2022.101830

PMID

36914304

PMCID

PMC10014930

PubMedCentral® Posted Date

March 2024

PubMedCentral® Full Text Version

Author MSS

Published Open-Access

yes