Faculty, Staff and Student Publications

Publication Date

7-24-2025

Journal

NPJ Precision Oncology

DOI

10.1038/s41698-025-01024-2

PMID

40707724

PMCID

PMC12289950

PubMedCentral® Posted Date

7-24-2025

PubMedCentral® Full Text Version

Post-print

Abstract

In phase III oncology trials, superiority is defined by statistical significance using P thresholds. However, this approach has been criticized because P is continuous. Here, we reconstruct patient-level data for 230 phase III oncology trials to model the robustness of statistical significance by estimating the survival-inferred fragility index (SIFI), defined as the smallest number of patients changing arms that alters the statistical significance interpretation. The median SIFI was 8 patients (IQR 4-19), representing 1.4% of enrollments (IQR 0.7%-3%). As a continuous statistic, P-but not the significance interpretation-was correlated with SIFI. Moreover, overall survival endpoints were more fragile than surrogate endpoints. Taken together, while phase III oncology trials are intended to robustly inform patient care, shifting the assignment of a few patients is often sufficient to upend the statistical significance interpretation. This vulnerability underscores the need for more robust strategies to identify superiority in oncology.

Published Open-Access

yes

Download

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.