Faculty, Staff and Student Publications
Language
English
Publication Date
1-15-2025
Journal
Development
DOI
10.1242/dev.204605
PMID
39817401
PMCID
PMC11829770
PubMedCentral® Posted Date
1-16-2025
PubMedCentral® Full Text Version
Post-print
Abstract
Developmental biologists can perform studies that describe a phenomenon (descriptive work) and/or explain how the phenomenon works (mechanistic work). There is a prevalent perception that molecular/genetic explanations achieved via perturbations of gene function are the primary means of advancing mechanistic knowledge. We believe this to be a limited perspective, one that does not effectively represent the breadth of work in our field. We surveyed a representative and diverse group of colleagues to share their views on what it takes to infer mechanism. Here, we briefly examine the factors that have shaped the dominant view of mechanism, summarize responses to the survey, present our views, and suggest a path forward that embraces a broad outlook on the diversity of studies that advance knowledge in our field.
Keywords
Animals, Humans, Developmental Biology
Published Open-Access
yes
Recommended Citation
B Duygu Özpolat, Swathi Arur, and Mansi Srivastava, "A Case for Broadening Our View of Mechanism in Developmental Biology" (2025). Faculty, Staff and Student Publications. 5303.
https://digitalcommons.library.tmc.edu/uthgsbs_docs/5303
Included in
Bioinformatics Commons, Biomedical Informatics Commons, Genetic Phenomena Commons, Medical Genetics Commons, Oncology Commons