Faculty, Staff and Student Publications

Language

English

Publication Date

11-18-2025

Journal

The Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer

DOI

10.1136/jitc-2025-012190

PMID

41253491

PMCID

PMC12636876

PubMedCentral® Posted Date

11-18-2025

PubMedCentral® Full Text Version

Post-print

Abstract

Background: Only a subset of polymerase epsilon (POLE) mutations is associated with hypermutant phenotype; we hypothesized that only loss-of-proofreading (LOP) POLE mutations are associated with favorable immunotherapy response.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study included a pan-cancer cohort of 69,223 patients from cBioPortal and a cohort of patients with 41 POLE mutant metastatic colorectal (CRC) treated with immunotherapy at the MD Anderson Cancer Center between January 2017 and May 2023. We evaluated prognosis according to POLE mutation functionality.

Results: In the pan-cancer cBioPortal cohort (n=69,223) POLE was mutated in 2.8% (1,965) of tumors; of these, only 7.5% (n=148) had LOP POLE mutations (0.0% of entire cohort). Endometrial cancer (6.6%) and CRC (1.2%) were the only tumor types with greater than 1% incidence of LOP POLE mutation. Overall survival was similar between non-LOP POLE and POLE wildtype patients (HR=0.94, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.07, p=0.34); conversely, LOP POLE patients had significantly better outcomes (HR=0.23, 95% CI 0.16 to 0.32, p< 0.0001). In the clinical cohort, all nine patients with LOP POLE mutations achieved durable clinical benefit (objective response rate (ORR) 88.9%, complete response rate (CR) 33.3%, disease control rate (DCR) 100%) and median progression-free survival (PFS) was not reached at the time of analysis, after median follow-up of 32 months. None of the nine patients with microsatellite stable (MSS), non-LOP POLE tumors achieved an ORR of 0%, with median PFS of 3.7 months (HR 0.05 LOP relative to non-LOP POLE, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.19, p< 0.0001). Interestingly, median PFS on first-line cytotoxic agents was significantly shorter for patients with LOP POLE compared with patients with MSS non-LOP POLE mutant tumors (2.1 vs 9.7 months, HR 3.33, 95% CI 0.87 to 12.74, p=0.012).

Conclusions: Identifying the subset of POLE mutations that cause LOP is critical to distinguish patients likely to respond to immunotherapy. Patients with CRC with LOP POLE mutant tumors experienced deep, sustained response to immunotherapy but were resistant to standard cytotoxic chemotherapy, in stark contrast to those with non-LOP POLE mutations.

Keywords

Humans, Female, Male, Prognosis, Retrospective Studies, Middle Aged, DNA Polymerase II, Aged, Poly-ADP-Ribose Binding Proteins, Immunotherapy, Adult, Neoplasms, Mutation, Aged, 80 and over, Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor, Biomarker, Colon Cancer

Published Open-Access

yes

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.