Faculty, Staff and Student Publications

Language

English

Publication Date

10-1-2025

Journal

Medical Physics

DOI

10.1002/mp.70067

PMID

41058450

PMCID

PMC12505027

PubMedCentral® Posted Date

10-8-2025

PubMedCentral® Full Text Version

Post-print

Abstract

Background: Since the introduction of whole-body photon-counting detector CT (PCD-CT) into clinical practice, extensive physics assessments have been conducted to elucidate its image quality advantages over energy-integrating detector CT (EID-CT) and to support its clinical adoption. However, evaluations of its three-dimensional (3D) noise power spectrum (NPS), which simultaneously quantifies in-plane and through-plane noise texture and magnitude, remain limited.

Purpose: To experimentally evaluate the 3D NPS of an NAEOTOM Alpha PCD-CT system and its dependence on scan mode, reconstruction image type, quantum iterative reconstruction (QIR) strength, mono-energy (keV) level, spiral pitch, and radiation dose.

Methods: Repeated scans of a 20 cm water phantom and a 30 cm PMMA phantom were conducted under the clinical Standard mode, clinical Ultra-High-Resolution (UHR) mode, and an Expert Service mode. Reconstructed image types include T3D, virtual monoenergetic image (VMI), and T1 (a linear reconstruction of total-energy bin available via the Expert Service mode). Data were collected at seven dose levels (0.4-24 mGy) and four spiral pitch levels (0.35-1.5). T3D and VMI images were reconstructed with varying QIR strengths, and VMIs were reconstructed at energies ranging from 40 to 190 keV. The 3D NPS, NPS3D(kx,ky,kz) , was calculated from each ensemble of 3D image volumes. Axial NPS2D(kxy)  was obtained by integrating NPS3D along kz , while NPS1D(kz)  was obtained by integrating NPS3D over kx and ky .

Results: NPS1D(kz)  of T1 images were flat, indicating no noise correlation across PCD rows. In contrast, all clinical-mode reconstructions exhibited through-plane noise correlation, as reflected in the shape of their NPS1D(kz) . For clinical-mode reconstructions, the shape of their 3D NPS showed a mild to moderate dependence on dose, with lower doses producing NPS profiles shifted towards lower frequencies in both axial and z directions. With a matched post-object radiation exposure, the larger phantom resulted in higher noise and stronger noise correlation compared to the smaller phantom. QIR only mildly enhanced noise correlation. For a given CTDIvol, spiral pitch has a negligible impact on 3D NPS. Due to through-plane noise correlation, the variance of T3D and VMI decreases with slice thickness ( Δz ) approximately as Δz−0.9 , in contrast to the Δz−1.0 scaling observed in T1 images. The shape of the 3D NPS of VMI showed only weak dependence on the keV level along the axial frequency direction. Compared to the Standard mode, the UHR mode reduced image variance by 26% when using a soft-tissue (Br44) kernel and by 77% with a sharp (Br76) kernel. However, 3D NPS analysis revealed stronger through-plane noise correlation in UHR images.

Conclusion: The 3D NPS provides new insight into the noise characteristics of PCD-CT: Noise in the native PCD-CT projection data is uncorrelated across detector rows, but clinical reconstruction processes introduce noise spatial correlation along both axial and z directions, particularly at higher QIR strengths, lower radiation doses, or with larger image objects that increase the percentage of scattered photons. Compared to the Standard mode, UHR mode reconstruction exhibits stronger noise correlation due to its superior detector spatial resolution, allowing for more aggressive spatial smoothing to achieve the desired spatial resolution in the final image.

Keywords

Photons, Phantoms, Imaging, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Signal-To-Noise Ratio, Imaging, Three-Dimensional, Radiation Dosage, Humans, CT image quality, noise power spectrum, photon counting detector CT

Published Open-Access

yes

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.