Using Content Validity Index Methodology for Cross-Cultural Translation of a Patient-Reported Outcome Measure for Head and Neck Cancer

Authors

• Janet H Van Cleave
• Alizendie Guerra
• Eva Liang
• Carolina Gutiérrez
• Ron J Karni
• Marcely Tsikis
• Geanise Pearl C Nguyen
• Allison P Squires

Language

English

Publication Date

1-1-2025

Journal

Frontiers in Health Services

DOI

10.3389/frhs.2025.1582127

PMID

40621434

PMCID

PMC12226542

PubMedCentral® Posted Date

6-20-2025

PubMedCentral® Full Text Version

Post-print

Abstract

Introduction: Translations of patient-reported measures may not account for structural and cultural differences in shared languages spoken in multiple countries, such as English, Spanish, Arabic, or Russian. The objective of this research was to create a cross-cultural Spanish translation of the New York University (NYU) Electronic Patient Visit Assessment (ePVA)© for head and neck cancer (HNC), a patient-reported symptom measure available only in English.

Methods: Using the Content Validity Index (CVI) methodology, an expert panel of nurses (n = 6) proficient in Spanish and English independently reviewed and rated a forward translation of the ePVA, a measure consisting of 21 categories of symptoms common to HNC. The panel rated the cultural relevance (1 = not relevant, 2 = somewhat relevant, 3 = very relevant, 4 = highly relevant) and translation equivalence (1 = yes or 0 = no) of each ePVA item. The CVI cultural relevance and translation equivalence scores for each item (item CVI) were calculated as the proportion of experts agreeing that the item was very relevant or highly relevant and the translation was equivalent. The scale CVI score was an average of the item CVI scores; the minimum accepted scale CVI score was .80. Items with CVI scores < 0.59 were labeled as problematic items and evaluated through cognitive interviews with native Spanish-speaking patients (N = 4) diagnosed with HNC.

Results: The translation was acceptable in cultural relevance (average CVI score = 0.95) and equivalence (average CVI score = 0.84). Cognitive interviews revealed 9 problematic items that differed in words and meaning, primarily addressing pain and swallowing symptoms. These items were refined and included in the final translation of the Spanish ePVA.

Conclusion: These study findings underscore the need for survey instrument translations that account for variations in shared languages spoken across countries.

Keywords

limited english proficiency, immigrants, patient reported outcome measures, head and neck cancer, public health

Published Open-Access

yes

Recommended Citation

Van Cleave, Janet H; Guerra, Alizendie; Liang, Eva; et al., "Using Content Validity Index Methodology for Cross-Cultural Translation of a Patient-Reported Outcome Measure for Head and Neck Cancer" (2025). Faculty, Staff and Student Publications. 4039.
https://digitalcommons.library.tmc.edu/uthmed_docs/4039