Faculty, Staff and Student Publications

Publication Date

7-1-2024

Journal

Journal of Medical Imaging

DOI

10.1117/1.JMI.11.4.043503

PMID

39185476

PMCID

PMC11342057

PubMedCentral® Posted Date

8-22-2024

PubMedCentral® Full Text Version

Post-print

Abstract

Purpose: We aim to compare the imaging performance of a cone-beam CT (CBCT) imaging system with noncircular scan protocols (sine-on-sphere) to a conventional circular orbit.

Approach: A biplane C-arm system (ARTIS Icono; Siemens Healthineers) capable of circular and noncircular CBCT acquisition was used, with the latter orbit (sine-on-sphere, "Sine Spin") executing a sinusoidal motion with ±10deg tilt amplitude over the half-scan orbit. A test phantom was used for the characterization of image uniformity, noise, noise-power spectrum (NPS), spatial resolution [modulation transfer function (MTF) in axial and oblique directions], and cone-beam artifacts. Findings were interpreted using an anthropomorphic head phantom with respect to pertinent tasks in skull base neurosurgery.

Results: The noncircular scan protocol exhibited several advantages associated with improved 3D sampling-evident in the NPS as filling of the null cone about the fz spatial frequency axis and reduction of cone-beam artifacts. The region of support at the longitudinal extrema was reduced from 16 to ∼12cm at a radial distance of 6.5 cm. Circular and noncircular orbits exhibited nearly identical image uniformity and quantum noise, demonstrating cupping of −16.7% and overall noise of ∼27HU . Although both the radially averaged axial MTF ( fx,y ) and 45 deg oblique MTF ( fx,y,z ) were ∼20% lower for the noncircular orbit compared with the circular orbit at the default full reconstruction field of view (FOV), there was no difference in spatial resolution for the medium reconstruction FOV (smaller voxel size). Differences in the perceptual image quality for the anthropomorphic phantom reinforced the objective, quantitative findings, including reduced beam-hardening and cone-beam artifacts about structures of interest in the skull base.

Conclusions: Image quality differences between circular and noncircular CBCT orbits were quantitatively evaluated on a clinical system in the context of neurosurgery. The primary performance advantage for the noncircular orbit was the improved sampling and elimination of cone-beam artifacts.

Keywords

cone-beam CT, noncircular orbit, source-detector trajectory, imaging performance, image-guided surgery

Published Open-Access

yes

Download

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.